Your Best Customer Just Churned.
Nobody Saw It Coming.

Your AI chatbots resolve tickets. Your humans handle escalations.
But nobody is monitoring quality or catching churn signals across both.

But the signs were there:

TICKET #1

AI chatbot "resolved"

(incomplete)

TICKET #2

Same issue, different agent

(attempt #2)

TICKET #3

Tone shifts to frustrated

(attempt #3)

WEEK 8

Mentions competitor

(nobody flags)

WEEK 12

"We've decided to leave"

$50K+ lost

Your support team was drowning in 200+ tickets a day. Switching between Zendesk tabs, AI chatbot logs, dashboards, spreadsheets.

They couldn't connect the dots.

Teravictus monitors every ticket

(AI chatbot + human support), catches the patterns humans miss, and alerts your team in Slack with full context - usually 30-90 days before customers leave.

Research shows this approach improves retention outcomes by 75-85% and catches 92% of at-risk customers early.

See the research →

Quality control for AI chatbots • Pattern detection for human support
360° context • Unified visibility • All in Slack

How Teravictus Works

We monitor every ticket from both your AI chatbot and human support, analyze patterns in real-time, and send critical alerts to Slack.

1

Connect Your Support Channels

Link your Zendesk account (Intercom, Freshdesk coming soon). We pull tickets from both your AI chatbot and human agents. Takes 5 minutes to set up.

2

We Analyze Every Interaction

Our proprietary AI algorithms use multi-dimensional pattern recognition to analyze support interactions, combining behavioral signals, conversation quality metrics, and historical context to predict churn risk before it escalates.

3

Get Critical Alerts in Slack

When we detect a high-risk situation, you get a rich Slack notification with full context: the complete ticket history, AI chatbot quality assessment, sentiment analysis, and recommended actions. Everything in one place.

4

Catch Problems Early, Retain Customers

Instead of finding out at renewal time, you catch issues 30-90 days early. Fix the root cause, improve your AI chatbot, and turn at-risk customers into success stories.

What Changes When You Can Actually See What's Happening

Research-backed ML techniques show significant improvements when critical signals are caught 30-90 days early:

📈

Retention Improvement

75-85%

Higher intervention success rate when signals caught 30-90 days early vs. last-minute save attempts

🎯

Detection Accuracy

92%

Of at-risk customers caught through multi-signal pattern analysis across AI + human support channels

⏱️

Time Savings

5 min

Triage time with 360° context vs. 45 minutes switching tabs and piecing together customer history

🤖

AI Quality Control

Real-time

Catch incomplete chatbot answers before customers churn silently. Improve chatbot training based on patterns.

📊

Team Performance

Proactive

Proactive improvements vs. reactive fixes. Systematic issues visible across tickets.

💰

ROI Impact

$50K-250K+

Annual churn prevented per customer. One save typically pays for years of Teravictus.

These improvements are based on peer-reviewed research showing multi-signal analysis outperforms single metrics by 40%.

Read the full research methodology and academic evidence →

How Teravictus Delivers These Improvements

1

Monitors Everything

  • • All AI chatbot conversations
  • • All human support tickets
  • • Quality of responses across both
2

Advanced Pattern Detection

Proprietary multi-signal analysis combining behavioral patterns, conversation quality, and historical context to identify at-risk customers before they escalate.

3

Delivers 360° Context in Slack

  • • What's happening (full situation)
  • • Why it matters (pattern analysis)
  • • What to do (recommended actions)
  • • No tab switching required
4

Enables Proactive Improvements

  • • Catch issues 30-90 days early
  • • Improve AI chatbot training
  • • Identify systematic problems
  • • Optimize team performance

Result: Retention improves 75-85%. Time saved. AI quality controlled. Team confidence increases. Customer experience gets better.

Why Choose Teravictus?

Complete feature comparison with leading alternatives

FeatureZendesk AIFin AIPylonTeravictus
Primary FunctionAutomate L0/L1 responsesAutomate L0/L1 responsesOrganize multi-channel ticketsPredict churn from support quality
Support LevelsL0 and L1 onlyL0 and L1 onlyAll levels (routing)All support levels
Scope of AnalysisOnly Zendesk AI ticketsOnly Fin AI conversationsAll channel messagesAll Zendesk tickets (AI + human)
Churn DetectionNot availableNot availableNot availableCore feature (92%)
Monitors Human AgentsNoNoNo (organizes only)Yes (every ticket)
Alert MechanismEmail notificationsNone (reactive only)New ticket / SLA alertsReal-time Slack with risk score
Pricing ModelPer-agent cost + per-resolutionPer-agent + per-resolutionPer-seat monthlyUsage-based ($25/week)
Plan AvailabilitySpecific Zendesk plans onlySpecific Intercom plans onlyStandalone productWorks with ALL Zendesk plans

See how Teravictus can help your team prevent churn and improve support quality

This Is What Your Team Sees in Slack

Complete context. No tab switching. Everyone on the same page.

T
Teravictus
APP
7:16 AM
🚨

CRITICAL INCIDENT DETECTED

Teravictus Analysis • Ticket #51 • Nov 3

📋 Ticket #51 - CloudScale Systems (Netflix)

Situation

Customer experiencing critical firewall issue. AI chatbot marked tickets #34, #38 as "resolved" but issue persisted. Now 3rd human escalation with 4 urgent, unanswered messages in the last 70 minutes.

See more
🔴
Critical Incident Score
95/100
⏱️
Response Latency
1h 10m

💬Recent Conversation

👤

Customer (1 hour ago):

"Please update and close the ticket by EOD"

👤

Customer (1 hour ago):

"Posting on behalf of Concio. Why is this still pending from such a long time?"

👤

Customer (1 minute ago):

"Fix this ASAP"

🤖AI Chatbot Quality Check

⚠️ WARNING: AI Chatbot Incomplete Responses Detected

AI chatbot marked tickets #34, #38 as "resolved" but customer reported same issue again. Chatbot responses provided generic troubleshooting steps but didn't address the specific firewall configuration problem.

Training Gap Identified: Firewall configuration issues

🎯Cross-Channel Pattern Analysis

Attempt #1: AI chatbot (incomplete answer)
Attempt #2: AI chatbot (incomplete answer)
Attempt #3: Human escalation (current)
Sentiment trajectory: polite → frustrated → angry → demanding
Response time: 3.5x slower than customer's baseline expectation

⚠️Impact Assessment

8 related active issues detected
Pattern indicates systematic firewall problem
AI chatbot training gap identified
High escalation and churn risk

📊Related Active Issues (8 similar tickets)

Tickets #44, #46, #47, #49, #52, #53, #54, #55 all reporting variations of the same firewall issue. Suggests systematic product problem requiring engineering escalation.

Recommended Actions

  1. 1.Immediate human response (within 15 min)
  2. 2.Loop in engineering team for firewall issue
  3. 3.Review AI chatbot training for this topic
  4. 4.Executive escalation recommended

Everything your team needs to know. In one place. In Slack.

• AI chatbot quality issues

• Human escalation context

• Cross-channel patterns

• Recommended actions

No tab switching. No manual digging. No wondering what you missed.

Built on Academic Research. Proven Techniques.

Teravictus uses machine learning techniques that academic research shows can achieve 92% accuracy in predicting customer churn.

Our approach is based on peer-reviewed studies showing:

  • • Multi-dimensional analysis outperforms single metrics by 40%
  • • Early detection (30-90 days) improves retention by 75-85%
  • • Cross-channel pattern analysis is 3x more predictive than single-channel monitoring

We didn't invent this science. We applied proven techniques to AI chatbot + human support monitoring.

The Details

Setup: 10 minutes, no engineering required

Cost: Starting at $25/week (no per-seat, no per-ticket fees)

Integration: Zendesk + Slack

Monitoring: All AI chatbot conversations + all human tickets

Detection: Proprietary multi-dimensional analysis, research-backed ML techniques

Output: Critical incident alerts in Slack with 360° context

What you DON'T get:

  • • Another AI chatbot talking to your customers
  • • A replacement for your support system
  • • More complexity or tools to manage

What you DO get:

  • • AI chatbot quality control layer
  • • Cross-channel pattern detection humans miss
  • • 360° context in Slack - no tab switching
  • • Unified visibility for agents, managers, leadership
  • • 30-90 day early warning system
  • • Confidence to scale AI chatbot support

Common Questions

"How is this different from my AI chatbot platform's analytics?"

Your AI chatbot platform (Intercom, Zendesk AI, Ada, etc.) shows you:

  • How many tickets the chatbot handled
  • Resolution rates
  • Customer satisfaction scores

What it doesn't show:

  • When the chatbot gave an incomplete answer and customer returned
  • The pattern across chatbot conversations + human escalations
  • Churn signals that span both support channels
  • Quality control on what the chatbot is actually saying

Teravictus connects both layers and flags the critical patterns your chatbot platform misses.

"Does this work if we don't use AI chatbots yet?"

Yes! Teravictus monitors human-only support too.

But if you're planning to deploy AI chatbots (or already using them), Teravictus gives you the confidence to scale - knowing you have:

  • Quality control on what the chatbot is saying
  • Detection of patterns the chatbot creates
  • Cross-channel visibility as issues escalate
  • Early warning before customers churn

"Do customers know you're analyzing their tickets?"

No. It's 100% internal.

Customers interact with your AI chatbot or human support normally. Teravictus operates in the background, analyzing patterns. Only your team sees the alerts in Slack.

Customers never know we exist.

"What if we already use an AI chatbot and it's working well?"

Perfect! That's exactly when you need quality monitoring.

Think of it like this:

  • Your AI chatbot is the player on the field
  • Teravictus is the coach watching game film

Even when your chatbot is performing well, you need visibility into:

  • The 2% of cases where it gives incomplete answers
  • Patterns where customers escalate after chatbot interactions
  • Systematic issues the chatbot consistently misses

Most teams with AI chatbots use Teravictus to confidently scale knowing they have oversight.

See Which Critical Signals
You're Missing Right Now

Book Demo

Demo: We'll connect to your Zendesk (read-only) and show you the critical incidents from the past 30 days-including AI chatbot quality issues and cross-channel patterns you didn't catch.

Weekly Plan: $25/week to try it risk-free. See how it works with your AI chatbot + human support. Cancel anytime.

Used by B2B support teams preventing $50K-250K+ in annual churn

Setup: 10 minutes | Price: Starting at $25/week | Integration: Zendesk + Slack

AI chatbot quality control • Cross-channel monitoring • Proprietary pattern detection • Research-backed